9 Comments

"The key focus of our ethics training and our practice, and even your own practice as a board was to make sure that we provide patients with informed consent and we maintain bodily autonomy."

Did this statement prick the medical board members' consciences? Or did they leave their souls and consciences out the door?

Applause. Standing ovation, doc. Much respect.

--The Solitary Reaper

Expand full comment
May 11, 2022Liked by Dr Paul Oosterhuis

Have they finally come to the conclusion that the more they censor people, the stronger the fightback is?

Expand full comment
Jun 23, 2022Liked by Dr Paul Oosterhuis

Hey Doc Paul. I'm Aussie, lost job to Convid, sold up, fled Sydney, cash & gold. I WILL NEVER EVER TRUST another sell out slimeball Doctor OR Nurse again IN MY LIFE. I will go full Viet Cong & hack off the ARM of anybody attempting to poison me with EUA experimental gene therapies... Australia is a Concentration Camp, wait & see what Anthony Stalineasy will do...he's already doomed us to -43% energy consumption by 2030 & no moronic MSM will tell boobus Australianos what this means. Civilization is FALLING.

Expand full comment
May 11, 2022Liked by Dr Paul Oosterhuis

Go sic em Paul! Finally made it it to WA only to be met with 17000 cases of COVID in 90% JabJabJab population! Oh dear!

Expand full comment

Thanks for what you do , pity more Drs in Australia didn’t have the courage to stand up and question. Well done Paul.

Expand full comment

I think that what's been lost is that the vaccine cultists are operating on the basis of herd instinct and herds always are controlled by mediocre intellects. So you have smart people submitting to mediocre people because of herd politics and suffocating their critical faculties. The mediocre people clearly have their own interests at heart rather than that of the herd.

Expand full comment

Hi Dr Oosterhuis, can we contact you to discuss this? Kind regards, Heather Saxena Australian Doctor

Expand full comment
May 30, 2022·edited May 30, 2022

It might help to consider what is critical thinking and what is not.

Critical thinking is _not_ rationalizing an emotion-based decision, i.e., deciding to follow the CDC because of panic over covid and using brainpower to justify that decision relying on dodgy science.

Critical thinking, as I see it, is the art of making good decisions on the basis of imperfect, even including fraudulent, data. It involves being able to separate wheat from chaff, being able to distinguish mountains from molehills, and being able to discern the key hypothesis to be tested.

Expand full comment