8 Comments
Jan 1, 2023·edited Jan 1, 2023Liked by Dr Paul Oosterhuis

The unknown long term effects of this type of gene technology is more concerning to me than the known and deadly short term consequences.

Not only is reverse transcription into DNA a valid concern. There is nothing spoken of the potential for damage to mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), which is more accessible to a novel toxic protein floating around in the cells cytoplasm. No access to the nucleus is needed.

'Floxed' a condition that results from the adverse reaction to fluoroquinolone antibiotics like Cipro, can lead to mtDNA damage. The condition can present in a variety of different ways and has been confused with fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, or even long covid.

Could something like this explain the adverse events with fatigue, aches or other cognitive changes after vaccination?

And they seem to skip over the whole field of epigenetics entirely. The role of gene expression on cell behavior, and that the factors which influence this within the wider environment are still mostly unknown.

Look into Agent Orange/Dioxins for an example. Despite being an ongoing issue for quite a long time, the mechanism leading to the cancers and birth defects long after the initial exposure are often attributed to epigenetic changes. They show without the obvious signs of mutagenesis, or observable damage to DNA. And the detail of exactly how this occurs is still being studied.

So if everyone starts having ninja turtle looking kids, growing cancers quickly, or go on to experience crippling episodes of fatigue that never seem to stop. Stop using plastic straws and just eat the bugs or something, because apparently it's climate change or whatever.

Expand full comment

"Down right misleading" - I'd prefer to say "criminal", and it's getting darker and darker when Jikky's FOI data about smeary mRNA and batch expiry date extensions are put together (Chris Martenson's unpacking of this data is chilling https://rumble.com/v230jdk-australian-covid-released.html). The bigger picture is also perhaps now coming into focus: the "not looking" by regulators, etc, seems less about denial/ incompetence and more about having been over-ridden by a NatSec agenda, if you take into account Sasha Latipova & Katherine Watt's detective work. JJ Couey's hypothesis as presented recently to the Doctors for Covid Ethics, is compelling, and darker still. Thanks for your grounded truth-telling Dr Paul. The coalface experience of deregistered doctors and gaslit v'injured folks is where the jab-rubber hit the road, and what I come back to when I need to get my bearings.

Expand full comment
Jan 1, 2023Liked by Dr Paul Oosterhuis

We don’t know.

Expand full comment
Jan 1, 2023Liked by Dr Paul Oosterhuis

Yes, I agree with Dr Rosemary Faire - 'criminal' or my other favorite term is nefarious. Let's also not forget Pfizer's Post Marketing -Experience Dec 28/2/21 also reporting over 1200 deaths in this same time period. Hmmm AusVaxSafety report done 24/2/21 - did they neglect to report this important information? Happy New Year

Expand full comment

Please can you forward this substack article to your local state and federal member and to any GP’s practices where you can access an email. Doctors in particular need to wake up and abide by the oaths they took

Expand full comment