Lancet preprint of Danish paper highlights failure of mRNA jabs to lower all cause mortality.
"non specific" vaccine effects loom large ..
Horowitz in the Blaze covers the paper very nicely:
“Based on the RCTs with the longest possible follow-up, mRNA vaccines had no effect on overall mortality despite protecting against fatal COVID-19.”
A first-of-its-kind long-term follow-up of over 74,000 adult participants in the Moderna and Pfizer trials found absolutely no all-cause mortality benefit from the two mRNA shots, despite the pandemic of a lifetime.
This study, which was funded by the Danish government, sought to contrast the results of all-cause mortality among those in the mRNA trials compared to those in the adenovirus-vector vaccine trials (J&J and AstraZeneca).
So how is it that mRNAs had no effect on all-cause mortality but protect against fatal COVID? Well, either they don’t really protect against COVID, or the nominal benefit is washed away by the mortality from adverse events.
… Ok, in my submission to the medical board last September, this was one of the posts on Facebook that was used to justify the urgent suspension of my medical licence:
I say negligible, Horowitz says nominal … but this first of it’s kind study in the Lancet does support my assessment ( from back in July/August 2021 ) with respect to mRNA vaccines.
Horowitz continues:
“What is clear, however, is that the mRNA vaccine makers understood that there was no mortality benefit for healthy people and pushed the shots on them anyway, even though they came with substantial non-COVID risk of adverse events.”
He goes on to highlight the interesting examples of New Zealand ( with it’s almost zero covid prior to it’s well subscribed vaccine roll out, and Nigeria with it’s herd immunity and only 4% vaccine uptake and no boosters in sight:
https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-the-failure-of-the-mrna-shots-is-on-display-for-all-with-open-eyes
One of the authors, Professor Christine Stabell-Benn’s interview by Freddie Sayers of UnHerd was a good discussion of the paper, and reveals other nuances, such as non specific effects, which can be beneficial or harmful … and I suspect, often, a bit of both. For instance, reducing covid deaths but increasing cardiovascular deaths.