1 in 2700 Boys in Hong Kong Study hospitalised with Myocarditis/Pericarditis post Pfizer
I wonder if other countries have this "pharmacovigilance" thing?
https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab989/6445179
This is a population cohort study in Hong Kong that monitored adverse events following immunization through a pharmacovigilance system for COVID-19 vaccines.
All adolescents aged between 12 and 17 years following the Pfizer vaccination were monitored under the COVID-19 vaccine Adverse Event Response and Evaluation Programme.
Results
Between 14 June 2021 and 4 September 2021,
33 Chinese adolescents developed acute myocarditis/pericarditis following Pfizer
29 (87.88%) were males and 4 (12.12%) were females, with a median age of 15.25 years.
27 (81.82%) and 6 (18.18%) cases developed acute myocarditis/pericarditis after receiving the second and first dose, respectively.
The overall incidence of acute myocarditis/pericarditis was 18.52 (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 11.67-29.01) per 100,000 persons vaccinated. The incidence after the first and second doses were 3.37 (95%CI 1.12-9.51) and 21.22 (95%CI 13.78-32.28 per 100,000 persons vaccinated, respectively.
Among male adolescents, the incidence after the first and second doses were 5.57 and 37.32 per 100,000 persons vaccinated.
or 1 in 2680 boys. or 373.2 PER MILLION
Now, put this together with the Kaiser Permanente data: (via the HighWire)
So a second source, adolescent boys, after second shot, 377.4 per million
537 per million = 1 boy in 1862 (18-24yo)
377 per million = 1 boy in 2653 (12-17yo)
This is at the second dose. God help our sons (and young men) at 3rd and subsequent doses if the trend continues...
So of the 24,000 school kids rounded up in the Sydney Stadium drive one weekend last August, given half are boys (12,000/2680 = 4.5 cases of myocarditis at the second dose)
Except for a very small cohort of adolescents with multiple comorbidities, we are giving these jabs to healthy children whose risk for death from covid is remote, closer to 1 in 1,000,000 and likely to be even smaller risk than that (heard not a single healthy kid who died of covid could be found in Sweden and France)
Also, look at the 18-24 yo cohort, it is even worse with 53.7 per 100,000. So fill a stadium with men, say 100,000 of them in the prime of their lives, say 18-24 yo and tell them 54 of you are going to have your life changed
What happened to risk/benefit calculations?